Topic summary
13% 2 analyzed articles/videos 960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quasars results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 327 hits . Analysis detected 2,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,675 of 16,562 topics). This Quasars is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Quasars
Topic details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst