Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quantum Physics results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Straw Man, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 585 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,299 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,530 of 16,131 topics). This Quantum Physics is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Quantum Physics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,299
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos