Topic summary
⁠9%2 analyzed articles/videos1,537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quantum Mechanics results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 3,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,320 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,055 of 16,562 topics). This Quantum Mechanics is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Quantum Mechanics
Topic details
Total words: 5,320
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos