Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quantum Information Science results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 2,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,997 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,524 of 16,562 topics). This Quantum Information Science is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Quantum Information Science
Topic details
Total words: 2,997
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.2%13.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos