Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Python In House results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,470 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Python In House is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Python In House
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Python In House (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,470
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos