Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Putin results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 945 hits. Analysis detected 5,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ā 58% (6,991 of 16,562 topics). This Putin is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Putin
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 58%Putin (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,944
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos