Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Zumwalt results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 945 hits . Analysis detected 5,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ā 67% (2,109 of 6,245 authors). This James Zumwalt is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. James Zumwalt
Author details
Total words: 4,944
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.5% 6.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst