Topic summary
⁠74%3 analyzed articles/videos1,724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Publishing results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,076 hits. Analysis detected 5,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,152 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,312 of 16,131 topics). This Publishing is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Publishing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,152
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.5%17.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos