Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Transparency results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 1,079 hits. Analysis detected 5,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,352 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,753 of 16,562 topics). This Public Transparency is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Public Transparency
Topic details
Total words: 6,352
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos