Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Protest results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 704 hits. Analysis detected 5,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,875 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,477 of 16,562 topics). This Public Protest is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Public Protest
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,875
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos