Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public Pensions results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 5,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,320 topics). This Public Pensions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Public Pensions
Topic details
Total words: 4,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos