Topic summary
29% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Meetings results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 394 hits . Analysis detected 2,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,617 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,929 of 16,562 topics). This Public Meetings is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Public Meetings
Topic details
Total words: 4,617
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst