Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Hearings results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Bandwagon, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 2,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,324 of 16,562 topics). This Public Hearings is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Public Hearings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.9% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.4%23.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos