Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Risks results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 2,259 hits. Analysis detected 14,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,809 of 16,562 topics). This Public Health Risks is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Public Health Risks
Topic details
Total words: 17,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos