Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Leadership results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 860 hits. Analysis detected 2,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,162 of 16,562 topics). This Public Health Leadership is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Public Health Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 3,280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 26.2%26.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.7%17.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos