Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Gatherings results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,337 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,523 of 16,562 topics). This Public Gatherings is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Public Gatherings
Topic details
Total words: 2,337
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos