Author summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Violet Miller results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 159 hits . Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,337 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,986 of 6,357 authors). This Violet Miller is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Violet Miller
Author details
Total words: 2,337
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst