Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public Funds results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 2,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,212 topics). This Public Funds is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Public Funds
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos