Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public Defenders results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Bandwagon , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 159 hits . Analysis detected 1,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Public Defenders is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Public Defenders
Topic details
Total words: 1,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Bandwagon: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst