Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Activism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 766 hits. Analysis detected 7,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,941 of 16,562 topics). This Public Activism is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Public Activism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos