Topic summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Access results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 448 hits . Analysis detected 3,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,489 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,250 of 16,562 topics). This Public Access is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Public Access
Topic details
Total words: 3,489
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst