Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Psilocybin results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 833 hits. Analysis detected 4,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,158 of 16,562 topics). This Psilocybin is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Psilocybin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.1%17.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos