Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Protests General Strike results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54.1% saturation with 1,375 hits. Analysis detected 8,490 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,543 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,122 of 16,562 topics). This Protests General Strike is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Protests General Strike
Topic details
Total words: 2,543
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 54.1%54.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 50.9%50.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 33.0%33.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 33.9%33.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 17.1%17.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 54.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 50.9%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 33.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos