Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Protest Coverage results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 837 hits. Analysis detected 4,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,163 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,488 of 16,562 topics). This Protest Coverage is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Protest Coverage
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,163
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.0% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.4%32.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 25.4%25.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 38.7%38.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.6%24.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 38.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos