Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prostate Cancer results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,190 hits. Analysis detected 5,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,428 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,092 of 15,447 topics). This Prostate Cancer is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Prostate Cancer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,428
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos