Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Propositional Fallacies results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Circular Reasoning, and Genetic Fallacy, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 677 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,160 of 16,344 topics). This Propositional Fallacies is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Propositional Fallacies
Topic details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Argument from fallacy9%
Wikipedia0%1/9/2026, 8:48:55 AM