Topic summary
22% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Property Tax Reform results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 1,342 hits . Analysis detected 12,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,102 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,356 of 15,690 topics). This Property Tax Reform is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Property Tax Reform
Topic details
Total words: 24,102
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles24.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst