Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Property Maintenance results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Status Quo Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,571 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,677 of 16,562 topics). This Property Maintenance is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Property Maintenance
Topic details
Total words: 2,571
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos