Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Promotion results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 3,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,581 of 16,562 topics). This Promotion is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Promotion
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠61%Promotion (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos