Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos1,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Procurement results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 745 hits. Analysis detected 7,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,389 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,707 of 16,241 topics). This Procurement is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Procurement
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,389
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos