Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Processors results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,351 of 16,562 topics). This Processors is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Processors
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.7%8.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.5%7.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.2%12.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos