Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Life results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 6,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,042 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,043 of 16,412 topics). This Pro Life is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Pro Life
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,042
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 23.9%23.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.7%24.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.3%22.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.3%21.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos