Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Privatization results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 4,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,428 of 16,562 topics). This Privatization is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Privatization
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.1%20.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.5%8.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos