Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Private Spaceflight results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 1,028 hits. Analysis detected 5,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,057 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,753 of 16,562 topics). This Private Spaceflight is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Private Spaceflight
Topic details
Total words: 3,057
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 33.6%33.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.2%9.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 33.6%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos