Topic summary
47%2 analyzed articles/videos1,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Privacy Violations results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 499 hits. Analysis detected 4,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,495 of 16,562 topics). This Privacy Violations is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Privacy Violations
Topic details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos