Topic summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pricing Strategies results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,052 hits. Analysis detected 8,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,010 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,436 of 16,562 topics). This Pricing Strategies is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Pricing Strategies
Topic details
Total words: 11,010
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos