Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pricing results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 592 hits. Analysis detected 7,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,004 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,950 of 16,562 topics). This Pricing is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Pricing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,004
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos