Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Preventive Health results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Nature, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 1,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,360 of 16,562 topics). This Preventive Health is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Preventive Health
Topic details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos