Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Preventable Deaths In Detention results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 918 hits. Analysis detected 5,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,116 of 16,562 topics). This Preventable Deaths In Detention is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Preventable Deaths In Detention
Topic details
Total words: 5,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos