Topic summary
â 29% 1 analyzed article/video 424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Press Conferences results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 213 hits . Analysis detected 1,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of â 57% (7,246 of 16,562 topics). This Press Conferences is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Press Conferences
Topic details
Total words: 1,272
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst