Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Walk Of Fame results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 484 hits. Analysis detected 4,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,458 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,813 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Walk Of Fame is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Presidential Walk Of Fame
Topic details
Total words: 1,458
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 25.1%25.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 27.3%27.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 33.2%33.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.8%26.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 32.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos