Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Rutz results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 484 hits . Analysis detected 4,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,458 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (499 of 6,628 authors). This David Rutz is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. David Rutz
Author details
Total words: 1,458
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.5% percentile 8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 25.1% 25.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 27.3% 27.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 33.2% 33.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 26.8% 26.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 9.3% 9.3% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 33.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 32.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 27.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.8%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 25.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 12.6%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Horn Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Red Herring: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst