Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Visits results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 308 hits . Analysis detected 1,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,452 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,511 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Visits is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Presidential Visits
Topic details
Total words: 3,452
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst