Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos2,849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Protection results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 1,996 hits. Analysis detected 9,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,001 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,521 of 16,558 topics). This Presidential Protection is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Presidential Protection
Topic details
Total words: 10,001
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos