Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Library results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 2,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 31% (11,562 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Library is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Presidential Library
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 31%Presidential Library (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,436
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos