Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Interviews results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,001 hits . Analysis detected 4,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,365 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (15,594 of 15,769 topics). This Presidential Interviews is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Presidential Interviews
Topic details
Total words: 11,365
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst