Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Presidential Income results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anchoring Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 311 hits. Analysis detected 2,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Income is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Income
Topic details
Total words: 987
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles987 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.5%31.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.4%16.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 16.8%16.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos