Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Presidential Fitness results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 8,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,266 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Fitness is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Fitness
Topic details
Total words: 7,266
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos