Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Documents results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,202 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Documents is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Presidential Documents
Topic details
Total words: 1,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.8%26.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos