Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video1,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Corruption results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 1,013 hits. Analysis detected 7,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,855 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,325 of 15,448 topics). This Presidential Corruption is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Corruption
Topic details
Total words: 3,855
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.0% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.3%26.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.1%24.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.5%8.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos